Laserfiche WebLink
that there are three questions that should be discussed prior to further review. These <br />are: <br />a. Should the credits be given to only designated "A and B" properties identified in <br />the Natural Resources Inventory, or should we also include "C" properties? <br />b. In order to provide true incentives for someone to sell their property, should <br />there be only a "one for one" development credit transfer or should this be <br />increased to some other ratio? <br />c. If a solid Wetland Ordinance and Tree Preservation Ordinance are adopted, is <br />there a need for a Transfer of Development Rights Ordinance? <br />3. Tree Preservation Ordinance <br />It is staff's understanding that there has been a lot of discussion on this ordinance and <br />that there are parts of it which have not been reviewed favorably. Staff is recommending <br />that the committee articulate which part of this tree ordinance is important to them, i.e. <br />avoiding clear-cutting, replacement or some other aspects of this ordinance. Staff will <br />then go back and develop a simpler, more defined ordinance proposal. Again, we <br />anticipate that for the Tree Preservation Ordinance that this be more of a broad policy <br />discussion for the evening. <br />If you have any questions on this, please call me at 763/635-1031. <br />cc: Bill Maertz, Parks & Recreation Director <br />Chris L.eeseberg, Park Planner/Planner <br />Scott Harlicker, Senior Planner <br />Rebecca Haug, Environmental Administrator <br />S:\PI.ANNING\NRI\02 28 061'F memo.doc <br />