My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8.4.B. PRSR 03-08-2006
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
P&R Packets
>
2001-2010
>
2006
>
03-08-2006
>
8.4.B. PRSR 03-08-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/3/2011 2:17:16 PM
Creation date
2/3/2011 2:16:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PRSR
date
3/8/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tree Preservation Ordinance <br />Draft, August I, 2005 <br />Page 5 <br />Mi~ation <br />In any development where the limits of the tree removal schedule are exceeded, the <br />applicant shall mitigate the tree loss by one of the following methods: <br />1. tree replacement within the development area or affected parcel in accordance <br />with the tree replacement schedule; or <br />2. tree replacement in accordance with the tree replacement schedule on other <br />property owned by the applicant in the City; or <br />3. tree replacement in accordance with the tree replacement schedule on public <br />property in the city. <br />Trees replaced under this requirement shall be in addition to arty other trees required <br />pursuant to other city ordinances and the subdivision regulations. <br />Minimizing Tree Loss <br />Min;m;~;ng the tree loss should be achieved by atry combination of the following: <br />1. Realignment of streets, utilities and lot lines. <br />2. Consideration of alternative utility configurations such as the use of ejector <br />pumps, force mains, or revised home elevations to m;n;m;7e grading. <br />3. Reductions in street width and right-of-way when the applicant can <br />demonstrate that significant tree preservation is directly related to the <br />modification. <br />4. Variation in street radius and design speed. <br />5. Modified grading plans. <br />6. Within PUDs, m;n;mum lot area requirements maybe reduced as long as it <br />can be demonstrated that significant tree preservation is directly related to <br />the modification. The overall density of the project shall not exceed what <br />would be allowed with typical lot sizes. <br />7. Within PUDs, variations in setback lines maybe allowed as long as it can be <br />demonstrated that significant tree preservation is directly related to the <br />modification. <br />Protective Measures <br />Required Protective Measures <br />The tree preservation plan shall identify and require the following measures to be utilized to <br />protect significant trees, specimen trees and significant woodlands: <br />1. Installation of snow fencing or polyethylene laminate safety netting placed at the <br />drip line or at the perimeter of the critical root zone, whichever is greater, of <br />significant trees, specimen trees and significant woodlands to be preserved. No <br />grade change, construction activity, or storage of material shall occur within the <br />fenced area. <br />S:IPLANNING\NRI1Tree Pres Ord 8 I OS.DOC rJ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.