My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.2. SR 01-18-2011
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2011
>
01-18-2011
>
7.2. SR 01-18-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2011 2:28:57 PM
Creation date
1/14/2011 2:28:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
1/18/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
If council members are engaged indirect electronic discussions, it's probably best to limit it to <br />only two members. A "no fo rdin and no copying" rule might be a good way to make sure the <br />Minnesota Open Meeting Law isn't unintentiona y violated through electronic conversation. <br />Finally, be careful when council members participate in a listserv, chatroom, forums and social <br />media. Because these groups may include a quorum of your council, one council member's <br />comments will be viewed by other members. 1f the topic has to do with city business and other <br />council members reply, it could prove problematic under the Minnesota Open Meeting Law. <br />Again, the city might consider a "no reply" sort of rule when it comes to these resources, or <br />perhaps have council members send ideas for postings or responses to the city clerk or <br />administrator to manage. Remember, too, that official citv~ommittees are subject to the same open <br />meeting requirements and should be similarly educated about correct electronic use. <br />Regardless of precautions, there may be times when council members find themselves accused of <br />violating the Minnesota Open Meeting Law, perhaps having unintentionally engaged in one of <br />these sorts of conversations. One way to diffuse some concern is to immediately release copies of <br />a!1 electronic correspondence to anyone who wants to see it. While this doesn't negate the possible <br />violation, it shows good faith and lack of specific intent to violate the law. <br />Draft guidelines for electronic communications between council members <br />Cities might decide to develop policies clarifying appropriate or preferred a-mail and electronic <br />communications use by and between council members. Even if a city doesn't formally adopt a <br />policy, the guidelines here might be helpful for any elected official or city board member to <br />follow. <br />The purpose of these draft guidelines is to suggest how members of city councils and other city <br />committees might communicate via email and electronic means. A city should review these draft <br />guidelines along with its normal operating procedures, consult with the city attorney and determine <br />the best course of action. <br />Tom Grundhoefer /Greg Van Wormer 09/09 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.