Laserfiche WebLink
Page 2 <br />Regulaz meeting of the Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission <br />December 14, 2010 <br />Jerry Gumphrey moved to approve the Consent Agenda as follows: <br />a. November Check Register <br />b. November 16, 2010 Minutes <br />c. Financial Reports <br />Daryl Thompson seconded the motion. Motion carried 3-0. <br />4.1 Review City Ordinance 78-51 WATER USE RESTRICTIONS and <br />David Berg discussed the odd even watering ordinance currently in place. Data was collected <br />from 71 cities, 46 of them have the same water use restriction as ERMU, two have only time of day <br />restrictions, and 23 have no watering restriction at all. John Dietz stated he did not think there was a <br />need for watering restrictions at this time and that it should only be implemented in times of an <br />emergency. Discussion followed regarding the current City Ordinance. Consensus was to revisit the <br />wording of the City Ordinance 78-51 Water Use Restriction in January. <br />At the November 16, 2010 ERMU Commission meeting, the City Ordinance 78-26 Private <br />Wells for Domestic Use was discussed. This Ordinance was brought to the City Council asking to <br />rename it 78-26 Prohibiting Private Wells for Domestic Use on Properties within the City served by <br />the City Water System. hi October the Ordinance passed 4-1. The concern for ERMU was the <br />possible loss of their top 20 water use customers if they chose to drill their own well resulting in an <br />approximate 10% loss in the water business. Last month John Dietz directed Tim Simon to do a water <br />model on the impact of the revenue loss for ERMU and the steps needed to recoup the estimated <br />$240,000. Tim Simon reviewed the rate impact and showed the rate would have to increase 16 to 17 <br />percent for all tiers. Discussion followed. John Dietz directed staff to put together a packet with <br />further information for the City Council and for Attorney Peter Beck to add to the exceptions, to <br />include wells drilled for heating and cooling with a max draw of 25 gpm or less. <br />Jerry Gumphrey moved to go forward with the changes to the Ordinance and review again <br />prior to sending it to the City Council for final approval. Daryl Thompson seconded the <br />motion. Motion carried 3-0. <br />4.2 Review and Consider 2011 Waee Proaosal <br />John Dietz gave his reasons for and against this issue. Jerry Gumphrey stated he holds the <br />employees to the greatest regards and finds it hard not to give them a raise. On the other hand, it is <br />difficult to pass on a raise to the consumers, so at this time he would only recommend a 1 % raise. <br />Daryl Thompson said he does not like the metro average survey because he thinks ERMU employees <br />