My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1. ERMUSR 01-11-2011
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2011
>
01-11-2011
>
4.1. ERMUSR 01-11-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2011 11:42:11 AM
Creation date
1/10/2011 11:42:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
1/11/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
recharge but if the storm water is routed by sewer systems to the rivers, recharge could be <br />reduced. <br />4. Further regulatory limitations on use of the Mt. Simon-Hinckley Aquifer in response to <br />regional lowering of water levels in the Mt. Simon-Hinckley Aquifer. <br />5. Unforeseen contamination of the aquifer. An example of unforeseen contamination of an <br />aquifer is the Woodbury-Cottage Grove area where a previously unknown contaminant (poly- <br />fluoro compounds) was discovered to be widespread in occurrence <br />Elk River Municipal Utilities currently does not have aback-up water supply (neither do many other <br />communities). Interconnections with adjacent communities are highly encouraged by the Minnesota <br />DNR to provide emergency water incase of unforeseen circumstances. Elk River is less vulnerable in <br />this regard than, for example, Minneapolis, which relies on a single intake for their water supply - <br />Elk River has seven wells and it is unlikely that all seven would experience a simultaneous failure or <br />contamination. <br />The surficial aquifer could provide aback-up water supply via wells, although additional study <br />would be necessary to determine the viability of the surficial aquifer in [he Elk River area. <br />Depending on the permeability of the Eau Claire Aquitard in [his area, it may be possible to pair <br />surficial aquffer wells with Mt. Simon-Hinckley Aquifer wells without inducing significant well- <br />interferenceeffects. Well Sites #5, #6 and #11-#12 appear to be the most promising and well yields <br />over 1,000 gallons per minute might be realized from these wells. Additional testing would need to <br />be performed to verify these estimates. The surficial aquifer is more susceptible to contamination and <br />to drought conditions than the Mt. Simon-Hinckley Aquifer. <br />Any use of surface water requires a level of treatment that is substantially more expensive than <br />treatment of groundwater. It is unlikely that Elk River Municipal Utilities could support the <br />construction and operation of a surface-water treatment plant and intake structure with its existing <br />customer base. The economics of a surface-water source might become viable if additional customers <br />could be added (e. g., by selling treated water to neighboring communities) or by partnership with <br />other communities in a jointly owned and operated plant. <br />Purchasing water from other parties to meet future demand may also be viable. It is unlikely that <br />nearby communities will have excess groundwater [o sell to Elk River because communities in this <br />area are already experiencing limits on groundwater availability. Therefore, any purchased source <br />P:\Mpls\23 MN\71\2371105 Water Supply Alternative Stady\FinalDeliverables\Alternatives_Report_final.doc 44 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.