Laserfiche WebLink
assume that communities relying on the river as a source of drinking water would implement <br />conservation measures to reduce high summer demands. Intake flows of 85 million gallons per day <br />for the Minneapolis Water Works and 45 million gallons per day for the St. Pau] Regional Water <br />System are likely possible during critical flow periods. Navigation lockages could be restricted or <br />suspended during low-flow periods. Historical records indicate that flows at Anoka have been as low <br />as 602 cfs in 1934, 529 cfs in 1976, 842 cfs in 1988, and 1,530 cfs during the drought period in 2006. <br />The 529 cfs measured in 1976 was an instantaneous flow resulting from automatic gate operations at <br />the Coon Rapids Dam. The lowest daily average recorded that year was 728 cfs. The short-term <br />water-supply plan includes a drought response plan that is triggered by a 72-hour average flow of <br />2,000 cfs at Anoka, with subsequent decision points occurring at 1,200, 1,000 and 750 cfs <br />(Metropolitan Council, 2007a). <br />Low-flow conditions in the Mississippi River at Fridley during the 1988 drought reached critical <br />conditions. Governor Perpich was faced with the decision to release water from upstream reservoirs <br />at Pokegama and Winibabigoshish reservoirs. That impending decision was greeted with significant <br />controversy by businesses and residents of the upstream reservoir communities that have come to <br />rely on the reservoirs for tourism and tourism-related income. The 1988 drought passed without <br />releasing water from the reservoirs but the pending actions resulted in a review of contingency plans. <br />The Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) developed draft drought contingency plans in 1992 for the six <br />Mississippi River Headwaters Reservoirs. The plans describe in detail how reservoir operating <br />decisions will be made during a drought. In 1994, in response to a request from the City of <br />Minneapolis, the ALOE prepared a study for determining the volume and travel time for various <br />releases from the headwaters reservoirs and how flows will recede at Anoka under a variety of <br />conditions. The report highlighted the limited potential of relying on the headwater reservoirs as a <br />source of water supply in the metropolitan area. For instance, if the flow at Anoka is 750 cfs and is <br />forecast to fall to 554 cfs in 37 days, an extra 100 cfs released from Lake Winnibigoshish and Leech <br />Lake (total of 200 cfs) would cause the flow at Anoka to rise [0 760 cfs (a 10 efs net increase) and <br />extend the time it would take the flow at Anoka to fall to 554 cfs by 19 days (Metropolitan Council, <br />2007a). The ACOE is required with various entities (e.g., DNR, tribal governments, resort owners, <br />etc.) before making its final decision on whether to release additional water. However, release from <br />the reservoirs has never been executed and it is unclear how that process would actually proceed if it <br />was undertaken. <br />P:\Mpls\23 MN\71\237] 105 Water Supply Alternative 5[udy\FnalDeliverablea\Altematives_Report_tinal.doc 27 <br />