My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.15. SR 05-19-1997
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1997
>
05/19/1997
>
6.15. SR 05-19-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:50 AM
Creation date
8/5/2003 8:48:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
5/19/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
comparable in size, weight and appearance <br />to these antennas and to which local <br />regulation would normally apply; Or <br /> <br />(2) is necessary to preserve an historic <br />district listed or eligible for listing in the <br />National Register of Historic Places, as ~ <br />forth in the National Historic Preservation <br />Act of 1966, as amended, 16 U.S.C. § <br />470a, and imposes no greater restrictions on <br />antennas covered by tiffs rule than are imposed <br />on the installation, maintenance or use of <br />other modem appurtenances, devices, or <br />]baures that are comparable in size, weight <br />and appearance to these antennas; and <br /> <br />(3) it is no more burdensome to affected <br />antennas users than is necessary to achieve <br />the objective described above. <br /> <br /> The FCC has given several examples of safety <br />restrictions on small satellite dishes, MMDS <br />antennas and television antennas that it considers <br />acceptable. These include restrictions on the <br />closeness of antennas to high voltage power lines, <br />requirements to keep a dear line of sight at <br />intersections, requirements for adequate bolting <br />or use of guy wires, prohibitions on blocking ~e <br />exits, requirements that antennas be a distance <br />from the lot line, and, in general, provisions of the <br />National Fire Association's model code and the <br />BOCA Code of the Building Officials & Code <br />Administrators International, Inc. <br /> <br /> Note that the exception in the rule for <br />restrictions in historic districts applies only to <br />federally recognized or eligible sites or areas. To <br />enforce a restriction in a state or local historic <br />district that is not on or digible for the National <br />Register, a local government would have to obtain <br />a waiver from the FCC. <br /> Local governments that wish to enforce <br />restrictions that do not meet these exceptions uriI1 <br />have to apply to the FCC for a waiver. Disputes <br />about whether a restriction for which a waiver has <br />not been issued can be enforced can be taken to <br />court or to the FCC. <br /> <br /> The second part of the rule applies to medium <br />size satellite earth stations that are between one <br />and two meters in diameter and are located in <br />commercial or industrial areas. That rule is much <br />broaderw it preempts any regulation that merely <br /> <br />"affects" these dishes, not just regulations that <br />impair reception. It reads as follows: <br /> <br />25.104 Preempfon of Local Zoning of Earth <br />Stations <br /> (b) (1) Any state or local zoning, land.use, <br /> building, or similar regulation that affects the <br /> installation, maintenance, or use ora satellite earth <br /> station antenna that/s two meters or/ess in <br /> diameter and is located or proposed to be located in <br /> any area where commercial or industrial uses are <br /> generally permitted by non.federal land-use <br /> regulation shall be presumed unreasonable and is <br /> therefore preempted subject to paragraph (b) (2). <br /> No civil, criminal, administrative, or other legal <br /> action of any kind shall be taken to enforce any <br /> regulation covered by this presumption unless the <br /> promulgating authority has obtained a waiver from <br /> the Commiss/on pursuant to paragraph (e), or a <br /> final declaration from the Commiss/on or a court of <br /> competent jurisdiction that the presumption has <br /> been rebutted pursuant to paragraph (b) (2). <br /> <br /> Counties and all other local governments that <br />believe their building code, zoning, and other <br />regulations pertaining to satellite dishes between <br />one and two meters in size in commercial and <br />industrial areas are reasonable and want to <br />enforce them must apply to the FCC for a waiver. <br /> To obtain a waiver, the local governing body <br />must file an original petition and two copies by <br />mail or hand delivery (faxes are not accepted) <br />with the Secretary, Federal Communications <br />Commission, 1919 M Street, N.W., Washington, <br />D.C. 20554. The petition is a legal document in a <br />form prescribed by the FCC that should identify <br />the specific regulation for which the local <br />government wants a waiver, and discuss in <br />convincing detail the reasons why the regulation <br />meets the criteria for a waiver. The FCC will <br />assign the petition a number and issue a public <br />notice that the petition has been filed. Anyone <br />opposed to the petition may file comments with <br />the FCC within 30 days after the Notice is <br />published, and replies to the opposition may be filed <br />by interested parties, including the local <br />government, within 15 days from the date the <br />oppositions are due. All the comments and replies <br />are publii documents. The FCC has not established <br />any deadlines for itself to make a decision on <br />petitions from local governments for waivers. The <br />burden of proof is on the local government to <br />demonstrate that the restriction is reasonable. <br /> <br />A CourffY AND LOCAL OrI:tCMtJ GUtDf TO THf TfLfCOMMUNtCATIOI~ ACT Of' 1996 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.