My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.15. SR 05-19-1997
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1997
>
05/19/1997
>
6.15. SR 05-19-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:50 AM
Creation date
8/5/2003 8:48:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
5/19/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a local government cannot deny a permit based <br />on concern about radiation. You can, however, <br />require that the applicant provide evidence that <br />the tower meets the FCC standards. <br /> <br /> We need t/me to review and revise our <br /> oM/nanc~s. Can we ho/d off making any deddons <br /> or taking any applications until we do so? <br /> The cellular industry will argue that any delay <br />or moratorium in processing applications in effect <br />prohibits their ability to provide service. The U.S. <br />District Court for the Western District of <br />Washington (State), however, in Sprint St~ectrum, <br />L.P.v. City of Medina, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS <br />6469, has recently ruled that a city that placed a <br />six-month moratorium on applications for towers <br />while it revised its zoning ordinance did not <br />violate the Telecommunications Act. The court <br />said that the city clearly intended to process and <br />approve applications once the ordinance was <br />revised, and that a temporary moratorium was, <br />under that State's law, an appropriate zoning tool. <br /> <br />Who &cide~ if a local government body has <br />violated the Telecommunkatlonz Act provisions <br />on wireless communications facilities? <br /> Claims that a local government has violated <br />this section of the Telecommunications Act will <br />be adjudicated by the appropriate state or federal <br />court. "Any person adversely affected" by t~he <br />action of the local government may bring in an <br />action in either state or federal court. The only <br />issue that can be appealed to the FCC is a claim <br />that the local government improperly denied an <br />application based on the harmful effects of radio <br />frequency emissions. <br /> <br />Are there any federal requirements applicable <br />to a wireless provider? Can a local <br />government require that these be met before <br />issuing a zoning or other pent, it w conmmct <br />or modify a cellular tower or other wire/ess <br />service facility? <br /> Yes. All antenna structures used for <br />communications must be approved by the FCC in <br />accordance with its regulations. In general, towers <br />over 200 feet and antennas that extend more than <br />20 feet above a supporting structure must meet <br />Federal Aviation Administration requirements for <br />marking and lighting, and towers in cririesl <br />airspace near airports need other FAA clearances. <br />In addition, towers must meet the requirements of <br />the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). <br /> <br /> The FCC requires applicants to show that a new <br /> tower will comply with federal rules affecting <br /> wilderness areas, wildlife preserves, endangered <br /> species, historical sites, American Indian religious <br /> sites, flood plains, wetlands, high-intensity white <br /> lights in residential neighborhoods, and excessive <br /> radio-frequency radiation exposure. Applications <br /> for towers that may have a significant <br /> environmental impact must go on public notice <br /> for comment. <br /> A court is likely to find a local government <br /> acted reasonably if it first required that an <br /> applicant demonstrate that the tower has met <br /> these federal requirements as a condition of local <br /> site, construction, or modification approval. <br /> <br />Does the FCC offer any assistance to local <br />governments in siting and modifying wireless <br />facilities? <br /> Yes. The FCC has several databases available <br />with information on licenses granted by area and <br />by service. The FCC also has designated a specific <br />person to answer local governments' technical <br />questions. For information contact Steve <br />Markendorff, Chief of the Broadband Branch in <br />the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau, at <br />(202) 418-0620 (e-mail: smarkend@fcc.gov). To <br />access the databases on-line, call Interactive <br />Systems, Inc., 1601 North Kent Street, Suite <br />1103, Arlington, Virginia, (703) 812-8270, or visit <br />the FCC Wireless Bureau's Public Reference <br />Room, 2025 M Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. <br />20554, (202) 3418-1350. <br /> <br /> Satellite "Dishes" <br /> The Act deals with satellite service reception <br />antennas differently than it does with wireless <br />telecommunications towers and antennas. And <br />the FCC has interpreted the Act's provisions <br />relating to satellite dishes as being far more <br />restrictive of local regulations. <br /> Satellite programming services involve the <br />transmission of signals from a satellite to a <br />receiver, usually a round "dish" that can vary in <br />size from 18 inches to 10 or more feet in diameter. <br />The size of the dish varies with the nature and <br />strength of the satellite transmissions. The <br />familiar, large backyard dishes are known as "C- <br />Band" Satellite dishes. These dishes are used to <br />receive lower powered transmissions. More <br />recently, direct broadcast satellite, or "DBS," service <br />has appeared. DBS uses higher power transmissions, <br /> <br />A Coumy AHD LOCAL Ot:rlCIAIJ GUIDE TO THE TE~CO~4~fUrflCATtOhtS ACT Of= 1995 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.