My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.7. SR 12-06-2010
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2010
>
12-06-2010
>
5.7. SR 12-06-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/3/2010 10:37:04 AM
Creation date
12/3/2010 10:35:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
12/6/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />1 comments: <br />'; <br />]im Rossman said... <br />I understand that the Commission includes representatives from the Legislature; federal <br />and state agencies that have jurisdiction over waterways; the Metropolitan Council; <br />Three Rivers Park District; Hennepin and Anoka counties; and representatives from <br />each of the cities adjacent to the Dam and the recreational pool. <br />What is done with the dam has an effect an other cities that are upstream from the <br />pool. I am interested to find out if your commission has considered how the effects of <br />what is determined for the future of the dam will affect the other upstream cities and if <br />the~were asked to be a part of the planning? <br />The way I see it is if the channel could be marked for PLEASURE CRAFT from mile 859 <br />up to and beyond Elk River our economy would see growth while business and buildings <br />along the river would then have added value attracting new investors willing to invest in <br />the communities. The river could be used to spur us in this down economy. <br />It might be possible that the cost of fixing the Coon Rapids Dam is above and beyond <br />the budget of the State or other government agencies. If the Asian Carp should get here <br />couldn't we close the lock at Upper St. Anthony Falls and offer a bounty to anyone that <br />kills one. Americans have never had a problem bringing other creatures to the point of <br />extinction. Why not this fish. The meat could be made into hog feed or pet food. <br />I realize that if the dam was removed that the silt that has built up over the years would <br />have to be removed to restore the channel, but the residence along the river in the old <br />six mile pool would then have access to the balance of the navigable waters below the <br />dam. This might be done at a far lower cost than repairs and maintenance to the dam <br />and the loss of revenue that may be brought upstream by having a pleasure craft <br />channel open when ever the water levels are high enough to maintain a continuous 4 <br />foot depth for pleasure boating. <br />November 13, 2010 8:55 PM ~ui:~: <br />Post a Comment <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.