My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.3. SR 03-31-1997
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1997
>
03/31/1997 - SPECIAL
>
4.3. SR 03-31-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:47 AM
Creation date
7/28/2003 8:13:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
3/31/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CIP Memo <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />allocation of over $500,000 we will be in better shape to do necessary street <br />projects. <br /> <br />CAPITAL PROJECTS - This is a city catch-all reserve fund that is mostly <br />used for street projects. However, this fund is also used for miscellaneous <br />infrastructure type projects including river rip rap project and our matching <br />share of grants and for such things as part of the city's share of the ice arena <br />project. The city needs to be careful in spending these funds because <br />additional revenues are limited. However, there is a great deal of demand for <br />use of these funds. In 1997, we know that over $350,000 will be spent out of <br />this fund (Joplin south of County Road 30, Joplin signal, Joplin north <br />frontage road, Ulysses north of 171st Street, and Lowell) and the starting <br />balance is less than $400,000. We will be adding $200,000 in revenue to this <br />fund in 1997. If the reconstruction of Dodge and 5th Street proceeds in 1997, <br />then based on the local share being about $265,000, this fund will then end <br />up in the negative. <br /> <br />The above MSA and Capital Projects information highlights the emerging <br />need of the city to establish a dependable recurring source of revenues for the <br />city share of street projects. This would not change our policy of assessing <br />out street projects, but the city subsidizing these projects is causing a <br />problem because funds are not available for the city's commitment. The only <br />known dependable recurring source of revenues is the tax levy and this may <br />be impossible if levy limits are approved by the state legislature this session. <br />If this happens we will really have a tough financial issue to address in the <br />immediate future. <br /> <br />STREETS- The revenues for this reserve comes from the landfill surcharge <br />which is available for general fund purposes. Some of this money ends up <br />being transferred into the general fund to offset street overlay and seal <br />coating expenditures. $35,000 is listed in the 1997 budget as a transfer. If <br />possible, we cancel this transfer at the end of the year if the budget looks like <br />it is in good shape. As the landfill revenues have increased and some <br />transfers have been canceled, this fund has grown to over $200,000. It is <br />anticipated that we will use this fund to finance the bridge railing that was <br />discussed last year and this may also be a good source of funds for any <br />sidewalk construction/reconstruction program and could also be a source of <br />funds for the city's share of any old core village street and sidewalk <br />reconstruction program. It should be noted that the balance of the landfill <br />money that is available for general fund purposes goes toward the library and <br />city hall (government buildings) fund for debt repayment on the building <br />lease/purchase plans. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.