My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1. SR 03-31-1997
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1997
>
03/31/1997 - SPECIAL
>
4.1. SR 03-31-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:47 AM
Creation date
7/28/2003 8:13:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
3/31/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to City Council and Planning Commission <br /> Februa~, 19, 1996 Page 4 <br /> <br />School District has had temporary buildings out in front of their high school <br />for the past 15 years. I've also heard "temporary" discussed as one or two <br />years; so the point is, it is very difficult to define temporary and even more <br />difficult to come up with a finite list of uses that could be considered as <br />temporary. Therefore, from an administration standpoint, the whole concept <br />of temporary becomes very subjective and difficult to interpret, as well as <br />enforce. <br /> <br />The most common method used by cities to identify allowable uses prior to <br />city water and sewer is to allow uses commonly found in a low density <br />residential or agricultural zoning district. These cities will have properties <br />that are presently not served with city water and sewer, zoned as a holding <br />district or, in Elk River's case, Rla or A-1. This method of establishing a <br />zoning designation, along with a specific list of allowable uses, clearly <br />identifies how property, whether it be residential, commercial or industrial, <br />can be used prior to city water and sewer. <br /> <br />The difficulty Elk River has is that a majority of the property is currently <br />zoned for its ultimate use. Therefore, trying to implement the system <br />described above may be very dif~cult given our current situation. The option <br />Elk River may wish to pursue is amending the zoning ordinance to identify <br />certain uses such as those found in the A-1 or Rla zoning district, that can be <br />used on properties zoned commercial and industrial that do not have city <br />water and sewer. <br /> <br />Can there be a compromise to allow development prior to water and <br />sewer? <br /> <br />Compromise on this particular issue goes beyond having a property owner or <br />developer waive their rights to future assessments and guaranteeing hook up <br />to utilities when available. These arrangements are well intended when <br />executed, however, for some reason, be it time, change of property owners, or <br />whatever, inevitably the City Council is confronted with an emotional and <br />difficult issue. It is at this point that all previous bets are off and reahty <br />takes over. At this point, property owners and City Council are sitting across <br />the table from one another discussing the actual costs and hardships that <br />may result. <br /> <br />Summary <br /> <br />Growth management is a proven method throughout the country that cities <br />have adopted in order to reduce public costs, managed traffic, preserve <br />farmland, protect against environmental problems, and simply maintain a <br />quahty of life for the community. Although gu'owth management is viewed as <br /> <br />s:\council\gmp.doc <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.