My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.2B. SR 03-17-1997
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1997
>
03/17/1997
>
6.2B. SR 03-17-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:47 AM
Creation date
7/28/2003 7:39:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
3/17/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WHEREAS, <br /> <br />the City Council has reviewed all of the materials submitted by the <br />Developers, the staff and the public, and has considered the <br />recommendation of the Planning Commission and the testimony <br />received at the Public Hearing on March 17, 1997; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />the Subdivision Ordinance of the City of Elk River provides that a <br />Preliminary Plat shall not be granted unless eight (8) specific <br />findings set forth in Section 1008.08(1)D of the Elk River <br />Subdivision Ordinance has been met; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />the materials and testimony received by the City Council on the <br />Project have raised a number of questions and concerns among <br />the City Council Members regarding the Project and the <br />compliance of the Project as presented with the requirements of <br />the City Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance for issuance of a <br />Preliminary Plat; <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Elk <br /> River finds that the Project, as proposed, does not meet the <br /> standards for issuance of a Preliminary Plat set forth in Section <br /> 1008.08(1) D. of the City's Subdivision Ordinance, for the <br /> following reasons: <br /> <br />THE PROPOSED PLAT DOES NOT TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE <br />PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SITE INCLUDING TOPOGRAPHY <br />AND NATURAL VEGETATION. <br /> <br />THE PROPOSED GRADING PLAN WILL REQUIRE SIGNIFICANT <br />AMOUNT OF GRADING TO OCCUR RESULTING IN THE SUBSTANTIAL <br />LOSS OF A MATURE WOODLAND AREA. <br /> <br />A COMPLETE SUBMITTAL OF STORM DRAINAGE INFORMATION HAS <br />NOT BEEN SUBMITTED TO ALLOW FULL REVIEW OF THE <br />GRADING/STORM DRAINAGE PLAN. <br /> <br />THE PROPOSED PLAT IS INCONSISTENT WITH ADJACENT <br />DEVELOPMENT AND MAY HAVE AN ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE <br />REASONABLE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT. <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />THE PROPOSED PLAT IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE <br />PLAN GOALS AND POLICIES TO ENCOURAGE SUBDIVISION DESIGN <br />WHICH PROTECTS WOODED AREAS AND NATURAL CONTOURS. <br /> <br />THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION INCLUDES LOTS WITH A DEPTH LESS <br />THAN TYPICALLY REQUIRED FOR 10,000 SQUARE FOOT LOTS. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.