My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.9. & 7.10. SR 02-18-1997
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1997
>
02/18/1997 - SPECIAL
>
7.9. & 7.10. SR 02-18-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:45 AM
Creation date
7/25/2003 3:29:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
2/18/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Finally, for satellite dishes more than two <br />meters in diameter, the FCC has kept in place <br />previous rules. The FCC did not immediately <br />prohibit the enforcement of local regulation of <br />these larger dishes, but provided that a citizen <br />could petition the FCC for a declaration that the <br />local or state regulation affecting larger dishes is <br />preempted. If a local regulation of larger dishes is <br />challenged, the burden is again put on the local <br />government to prove that its regulation is not <br />unreasonable. A citizen or business that believes <br />it has been aggrieved by the application or <br />potential application of a state or local zoning or <br />other regulation affecting the larger dishes must <br />file a petition with the FCC asking that the <br />regulation be declared unreasonable. The <br />petitioner must show that it has exhausted all <br />local administrative remedies before asking the <br />FCC to get involved. The petitioner must show, <br />for example, the normal zoning .or other appeal <br />process has been completed. <br /> A county or other local govemment will know <br />when someone has appealed to the FCC because <br />the petitioner must serve a copy on the <br />appropriate local officials, and the FCC will send a <br />copy of its notice that the petition has been filed <br />to affected parties by certified mail. After public <br />notice the local government and others will have <br />30 days to comment, and an additional 15 days for <br />replies. Again, the FCC has not established any <br />deadlines for its own decision making. <br /> In filing a petition to enforce its regulations or <br />to defend itself against a petition to bar <br />enforcement, a local government will want to <br />consult its attorney or an attorney specializing in <br />FCC matters. <br /> <br />Television Antennas <br />and MMDS Antennas <br /> Common television antennas range from small <br />roof-top extensions to large free-standing <br />reception towers used by businesses and <br />homeowners in outlying areas. MMDS, also <br />known as "wireless cable," is a service involving <br />the transmission of multiple channels of television <br />programming through earth-bound (rather than <br />.satellite) transmitters. To receive MMDS, a <br />subscriber must have a special antenna installed. <br />The FCC has adopted the same rules and <br />procedures for MMDS and television antennas as <br />for small satellite dishes. <br /> <br />Private Covenants <br />and Restrictions <br /> In many jurisdictions, restrictions on the use or <br />plac,',~,-,xt of television antennas and satellite <br />dish~ am contained in restrictive covenants in <br />private developments rather than in any local law <br />or zoning ordinances. The FCC's rules on small <br />satellite d'ushes and antennas discussed above <br />apply to these private rules and covenants if the <br />pmpert~ question is owned or controlled by the <br />antenna use~ The FCC has not yet made a <br />decision on how to treat restrictions that apply to <br />rental property, such as provisions in a tenant's <br />lease that forbid putting an antenna on the roof, <br />or restrictions that apply to common areas of <br />condominiums, cooperatives and similar property. <br /> <br /> Telecommunications Facilities <br /> on Federal and State Property <br /> Finally, local governments that have federal <br />buildings or federally owned lands such as <br />national parks and forests within their borders will <br />be interested in new section 704(c) of the <br />Telecommunications Act. This provision should <br />be a model for local governments considering <br />adopting siting policies. Ideally, this policy could <br />be adopted by the FCC as the standard for all <br />government entities engaged in cellular tower <br />siting. The provision encourages federal agencies <br />to make federal property, rights-of-way, and <br />easements available for a broad range of private <br />sector telecommunications facilities, including <br />television broadcast towers, cellular telephone <br />towers, and microwave transmitters. <br /> The General Services Administration has <br />established policy guidelines for federal agencies to <br />carry out this provision. In contrast to the proposals <br />of the FCC, the GSA policy is respectful of <br />governmental interests m both federal, state and <br />local. It requires federal agencies to act on requests <br />for siting commercial facilities "in accordance with. <br />.. State and local laws and regulations, and <br />consistent with.., public health and safety <br />concerns, environmental and aesthetic concerns, <br />preservation of historic buildings and monuments, <br />protection of natural and cultural resources .... " <br />Local governments may want to contact the local <br />or regidhal office of federal agencies that have <br />buildings or land in the community to ensure that <br />this coordination takes place. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.