My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.9. & 7.10. SR 02-18-1997
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1997
>
02/18/1997 - SPECIAL
>
7.9. & 7.10. SR 02-18-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:45 AM
Creation date
7/25/2003 3:29:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
2/18/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Seveml new wireless communications <br />technologies have developed in the past <br />few years. Many are forms of <br />telecommunications services, such"as <br />paging service and cellular telephone service. <br />In the years ahead, personal communications <br />service ("PCS") will also likely become more <br />popular. Others are forms of television service <br />delivery, such as direct broadcast satellite <br />("DBS") service. Although these technologies <br />are "wireless," they all require, to varying <br />degrees, the construction of either transmitting <br />equipment (placed either on towers or sometimes <br />on smaller "mono-poles") or receiving equipment <br />(such as satellite dishes), or both, on public or <br />private land. Most also require construction in the <br />rights-of-way to lay wires to connect the towers <br />with studios, switches, and computer control <br />points. <br /> The cellular industry estimates that the number <br />of towers needed will increase from 20,000 <br />currently in use to over 100,000 nationwide over <br />the next five to ten years. <br /> The businesses seeking to offer these new <br />services t primarily the wireless <br />telecommunications industry and the DBS <br />industry -- tried very hard to persuade Congress <br />and the FCC to preempt all local zoning and other <br />regulatory authority over their facilities. Local <br />governments responded by pointing out that they <br />are not delaying industry growth. And industry <br />claims that local zoning and safety regulations are <br />major barriers to expansion of <br />telecommunications competition are greatly <br />exaggerated. A survey by the American Planning <br />Association, for example, showed that 92 <br />percent of applications for cellular towers were <br />approved by local governments, most within 60 <br />days. <br /> Thanks to the efforts of local governments and <br />organizations, including the National Association <br />of Counties and the American Planning <br />Association, the 1996 Act preserves and affirms <br />local authority over the placement, construction <br />and modification of cellular telephone facilities <br />and other "personal wireless telecommunications" <br />service facilities. <br /> The Act also instructs the FCC to adopt <br />rules that "prohibit restrictions that impair a <br />viewer's ability to receive video programming" <br />using satellite dishes, television antennas, and <br />multipoint multichannel service antennas. <br />Unfortunately, the FCC has responded to this <br /> <br />latter directive with rules that greatly limit <br />local regulation of these types of antennas. The <br />FCC has also limited non-governmental <br />restrictions of dishes and antennas, such as <br />homeowner association rules, condominium <br />rules and private covenants that affect an <br />owner's own property, and is considering how <br />far to go in prohibiting restrictions that are <br />contained in leases and for common areas of <br />condominiums, cooperatives and homeowner <br />associations. <br /> These FCC proposals are vigorously opposed by <br />local government organizations, including the <br />National Association of Counties and the <br />American Planning Association. Efforts will <br />continue to get the FCC to reconsider and revise <br />these rules, and if necessary may challenge the <br />FCC in the courts. In the meantime, the following <br />paragraphs describe the effect of the Act and the <br />FCC's current rules on various kinds of <br />telecommunications facilities, and present some of <br />the questions that local governments need to <br />answer. <br /> <br />Personal Wireless Service <br />Facilities <br /> Personal wireless services include cellular <br />telephone, personal communications services, <br />other mobile radio services, and any other FCC- <br />licensed wireless common carriers. Although <br />these services are classed together, each service <br />works with a somewhat different technology and <br />requires a different type of antenna and <br />transmission facility. <br /> Cellular telephone service works by <br />transmitting signals from relatively low-power <br />transmitters on tall towers. Each transmitter <br />covers an area called a "cell." As the user travels <br />through one cell to another, the signal is "handed <br />off" from one transmitter to another in the <br />adjacent cell. <br /> Cellular transmitters are on towers of varying <br />height, usually ranging from 40 to 300 feet and <br />higher. Cellular transmitters also can be located <br />on top of tall buildings. The number of towers <br />needed to serve a particular area depends on the <br />terrain and the population density-- more users <br />may mean more and smaller cells, and therefore, <br />additional facilities, with varying heights required <br />for clear transmission. <br /> Personal communications service, or "PCS", is <br /> <br />A COUNTY AND [.OC, AL OFFIC, IAL$ GUII~. TO IH£ ~'£L~¢OMMUPlICAIIOPI~ AC, T OF 1~6 i~ <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.