My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.0. SR 01-27-1997
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1997
>
01/27/1997
>
7.0. SR 01-27-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:44 AM
Creation date
7/24/2003 7:09:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
1/27/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
o <br /> <br />the tax increment revenues for taxes payable in the current calendar year; <br />whether the tax increment financing plan or other governing document permits increment <br />revenues to be expended outside of the tax increment financing district; <br />any additional information that the State Auditor may require. <br /> <br />Copies of this report must also be provided to the county and school district boards. <br /> <br />Y. MUNICIPAL APPROVAL <br /> <br />Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3, before or at the time of approval of the <br />tax increment financing plan, the municipality shall make the following findings and shall set forth in <br />writing the reasons and supporting facts for each determination. <br /> <br />Finding tha? the Tax Increment Financing District No. 16 is a redevelopment district as defined <br />in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 10. <br /> <br />District No. 16 consists of 3 parcels of property. The District qualifies as a redevelopment <br />district as defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 469.174, subd. 10. <br /> <br />Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council and the Authority, <br />would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and <br />that the increased market value of the site that could reasonable be expected to occur without the <br />use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to <br />result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax <br />increments for the maximum duration of the district permitted by the plan. <br /> <br />Due to the high cost of redevelopment on parcels currently occupied by substandard buildings, <br />the incompatible land uses at close proximity, and the cost of financing the proposed <br />improvements, this project is feasible only through assistance, in part, from tax increment <br />financing. <br /> <br />Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Plan conforms to the general plan for the development <br />or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole. <br /> <br />The site is appropriately zoned. The Tax Increment Financing Plan has been reviewed by the <br />Planning Commission and been found to conform to the general development plan of the City. <br /> <br />Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 16 will <br />afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City az a whole, for the <br />development of Development District No. I by private enterprise. <br /> <br />The establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 16 will result in increased <br />employment for the City and will eliminate a blighting influence in the downtown area. <br /> <br />Z. COUNTY ROAD COSTS <br /> <br />Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision la, the county board may require the <br />authority to pay for all or part of the cost of county road improvements if the proposed development to be <br /> <br />Tax Increment Financing District No. 16 Page Il-12 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.