My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.1. ERMUSR 10-12-2010
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2010
>
10-12-2010
>
6.1. ERMUSR 10-12-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2010 2:00:56 PM
Creation date
10/11/2010 2:00:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
10/12/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Elk River <br />Municipal Utilities <br />13069 Oroao Parkway • P.O. Box 430 <br />Elk River, MN 55330.0430 <br />UTILITIES COMMISSION MEETING <br />Phone: 763.441.2020 <br />Fax: 763.441.8099 <br />TO: FROM: <br />Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission Theresa Slominski -Finance Director/Office <br />John Dietz, Chair Manager <br />Jerry Gumphrey, Vice Chair <br />Da 1 Thom son, Trustee <br />MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: <br />October I2, 2010 61 <br />SUBJECT: <br />Staff U dates -Finance Director/Office Manaeer <br />DISCUSSION: <br />As requested from the last commission meeting, I approached Paymentus about reviewing their <br />rate for an absorbed fee. Tbey had proposed a rate of $2.40 per transaction and now have offered <br />a rate of $2.25 per transaction that would have a maximum of $500. The maximum doesn't limit <br />the amount we will take for a credit card payment, only the point at which we would be charged <br />additional fees, just like the $300 maximum that is in place now. For example, if a customer <br />were paying a $600 bill by credit card, in the absorbed model the customer would see no fee and <br />ERMU would be charged $4.50; $2.25 for the first $500 and another $2.25 for the additional <br />$100. The maximum credit card transaction Paymentus would process would be $25,000 and so <br />we would have a maximum fee of X112.50 ($25,000/$500 = 50 x $2.25 = $112.50). If it is the <br />commission's desire to pursue this, I would need to have a motion, and then we would have an <br />amendment drawn up from Paymentus to be signed by Troy or myself. <br />Last month I mentioned that our insurance rates were remaining the same and at the end of the <br />month we met with our insurance broker to review the information. It was recommended that we <br />move from processing our Flexible Spending Accounts (FBAs) internally to an outside third <br />party processor. The recommendation comes as a result of the compliance regulations that are in <br />place and suggested as a protection measure for ourselves. The FSAs are accounts setup with <br />pretax deductions that come out of the employees' paychecks each payroll and then expenses are <br />submitted to be reviewed and reimbursed back to the employee. There is additional testing that <br />needs to be done now and the qualifying expenses and related reviewing are becoming more <br />complex, especially with the change to over-the-counter prescription required reimbursements. <br />To have a third party processor our cost would be $1.83 per participant per month (potentially <br />$64.05 per month if everyone participated). This would also allow employees to utilize a debit <br />card for some of these expenses, rather than paying out of pocket and then being reimbursed by <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.