Laserfiche WebLink
Economic Development Authorry Minu[es <br />September 10, 2007 <br />4.1. <br />Page 2 <br />City Administrator Lori Johnson explained that the resolution establishing the 2008 <br />referendum tax levy for the YMCA must be considered by the Economic Development <br />Authority due to a requirement ui the law. Ms. Johnson stated that the levy for taxes payable <br />in 2008 for the purpose of funding the debt service on the $12 million bonds is $310,215. <br />She stated that the city has been awarded the Shecbume County Legacy Grant which has <br />reduced the amount of the bond levy. <br />President Gongoll questioned if the bond levy for the YMCA will need to be considered by <br />the EDA on an annual basis. Ms. Johnson stated that yes, the EDA will need to consider a <br />bond levy resolution annually until the bonds are paid off. <br />Commissioner Tveite questioned if the Legacy Grant is a one-time award. Ms. Johnson <br />explained that the grant award was approximately $1,403,000, depending on the amount of <br />cecycled material included in the YMCA project. She stated that the grant is proposed to <br />reduce the levy by $250,000 for the first five years and by the remaining balance on the sixth <br />year. <br />MOVED BY COMMISSIONER DWYERAND SECONDED BY <br />COMMISSIONER TVEITE TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 07-05 ESTABLISHING <br />THE ?A08 REFERENDUM TAX LEVY AS APPROVED BY VOTERS FOR A <br />RECREATIONAL FACILITY TO BE LEASED TO THE YMCA. MOTION <br />CARRIED 7-0. <br />5. upd eon a eway_Rudn c enter <br />Planning Manager Jeremy Barnhart presented his staff report Mr. Barnhart indicated that at <br />the June 11 EDA meeting, staff was directed to contact the property owners to gauge their <br />interest in selling to the city. He explained that during discussions with the three adjacent <br />property owners, two of the property owners indicated they were interested in buying the <br />city's land rather than selling their land and the third indicated he was negotiating a sale to <br />one of the other property owners. Staff did not feel it was appropriate to enter into the <br />middle of those discussions. Mx. Barnhart indicated that staff is requesting direction on how <br />to proceed. <br />Commissioner Farber stated that he would like to maintain flexibility on this project. Mr. <br />Barnhart indicated that from a planning standpoint, the project is flexible but that certain <br />aspects, such as utilities and access point ace more rigid. <br />Commissioner Dwyer indicated that he is not opposed to selling the property to a private <br />developer for highway commercial. <br />Commissioner Motin stated that he does not want to see the property sold and that a <br />possibility would be to work out a development agreement with the adjacent property <br />owners. <br />Commissioner Tveite indicated that he does not object to selling the property but would like <br />to see a proposal from the prospective buyer first He would like that level of detail prior to <br />entering into a sale. <br />