My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3.0. SR 01-21-1997
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1997
>
01/21/1997
>
3.0. SR 01-21-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:43 AM
Creation date
7/24/2003 6:31:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
1/21/1997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Commission believes that the community center issue cannot be <br />adequately addressed until it is determined if the Minnesota Sports <br />Federation (MSF) proposal is going to move forward. This leads us to one of <br />the basic questions of"what is a community center?"... Is a community center <br />a meeting space area or is it a health club facility. <br /> <br />The city attempted to define the community center issue a number of years <br />ago. In late 1989, a community survey was conducted by Decision Resources. <br />This survey concentrated on park and recreation activities as the city was <br />putting together the Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan, but also <br />asked questions regarding a community center. Following this survey a <br />Community Center Task Force was established with an open agenda. The <br />Council wanted the Task Force to "think big", and then the City Council <br />would scale back the proposal as finances and reality dictated. One of the <br />issues that has never been addressed is how to scale back the community <br />center proposal to correspond to the needs identified in the community <br />survey. <br /> <br />Attached for your review is the community survey from 1989, the Executive <br />Summary of this survey from 1989, and selected pages from the late 1990 <br />community center report. Questions #106-136 of the survey relate to park <br />and recreation and community center issues. Pages 2-5 and beginning at the <br />end of Page 7 to the top of Page 9 of the Executive Summary relate to park <br />and recreation and community center issues. One of the key components of <br />the community center attachment is the phasing in concepts at the end of the <br />report. <br /> <br />It seems that a number of issues are on the agenda to be discussed at this <br />meeting. One issue is whether or not the city should allow the park and <br />recreation bond issue to move forward. Another issue relates to if the City <br />Council should require a community center to be part of any public bond <br />referendum and/or whether or not this will cloud the issue so that neither <br />question gets a fair opportunity before the public. Additionally, if a <br />community center issue is to move forward now, the next question is whether <br />a Task Force should be established before or after a community survey is <br />completed. <br /> <br />It is the Park and Recreation Commission's desire to move forward with a <br />community survey now, to only deal with outdoor park and recreation issues <br />as a public referendum question, and to have a community center issue wait <br />until it is determined whether or not the MSF proposal is moving forward. <br /> <br />Attached are the 1/2/97 Special Park and Recreation Commission meeting <br />minutes when a possible bond issue was discussed. <br /> <br />kXelkriverX, syskshrdocXcouncilkpark&recXbndrefdm.doc <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.