My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.3. SR 06-16-2003
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2003
>
06/16/2003
>
4.3. SR 06-16-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:41 AM
Creation date
6/30/2003 2:14:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/16/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Review of Benefit-Cost Analysis of Northstar Commuter Rail 7 <br /> <br />SummarY-while it is impossible to predict by how much the capital cost of <br />commuter rail will exceed estimates, it is clear that the operating cost of <br />commuter rail should be increased by $137.7 million. <br /> <br />Alternatives to Commuter Rail <br /> <br />Anton, Lubov calculated the costs of two alternatives to Northstar commuter rail. <br />One alternative was to build a new lane on U.S. 10 for the entire 82 miles of the <br />Northstar rail route. At $13 million a mile, Anton, Lubov estimated that this <br />would cost $1,068 million. The other alternative was to build exclusive bus lanes <br />for 41 miles of the route. Along with stations and new buses, this was estimated <br />to cost $525 million. <br /> <br />These costs are far too high. Moreover, particularly in the case of a new highway <br />lane, they compare apples with oranges because a new highway lane would <br />carry far more traffic than could be carried by a commuter rail line. <br /> <br />Anton, Lubov assumed that a new lane on U.S. 10 would cost an average of $13 <br />million per mile. An exclusive bus lane was assumed to cost nearly the same, or <br />about $11 million per mile. Such costs are unrealistically high, particularly since <br />most of U.S. 10 goes through rural areas where land costs are low. <br /> <br />Highway costs can be very expensive when there is a lot of tunneling or <br />bridgework involved, as in the Boston Central Artery project. But when Los <br />Angeles completed its Century Freeway in 1993, many called it the most <br />expensive road in the world. Yet it cost only about $15 million per lane mile, <br />much of which went to mitigate the impacts of the highway on nearby <br />neighborhoods, not for actual construction.4 <br /> <br />In general, limited access freeways such as Interstate 94 will cost an average of $5 <br />million per lane mile, while arterials such as U.S. 10 will cost an average of $2.5 <br />million a lane mile. Anton, Lubov's $13 million per lane mile cost is probably five <br />times higher than is realistic. <br /> <br />In reality, the alternative to Northstar commuter rail is not new construction but <br />simply to run comfortable, long-distance commuter buses on 1-94 between Rice, <br />St. Cloud, and Minneapolis-St. Paul. Buses have the advantage that they are <br />more flexible than four-car trains. While a four-car train would be nearly empty <br />along part of its route, buses could be run in the numbers needed for each <br />segment of the route between Rice and Minneapolis. Buses could also continue <br />onto St. Paul, Bloomington, or other major points in the Twin Cities. <br /> <br />Anton, Lubov estimates total capital costs of its alternative busway of $525 <br />million, of which about $450 million is for construction of exclusive bus lanes. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.