My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.3. SR 06-16-2003
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2003
>
06/16/2003
>
4.3. SR 06-16-2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:41 AM
Creation date
6/30/2003 2:14:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/16/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Review of Benefit-Cost Analysis of Northstar Commuter Rail 3 <br /> <br />driving during the peak hour, this will lead other people to shift their work <br />hours, routes, or locations. The net effect will be a minimal change in travel <br />delays. <br /> <br />Vehicle operating cost savings-Savings in vehicle operating costs represented <br />the largest benefit calculated by either MnDOT or Anton, Lubov. The crucial <br />assumption for this benefit is that motor vehicles cost an average of 28.8 cents per <br />mile to operate. This high cost, however, is not the true operating cost of a motor <br />vehicle; instead, it is the cost of ownership. In other words, it includes both <br />variable operating costs, such as tires and gasoline, and fixed ownership costs, <br />including insurance and depreciation. <br /> <br />According to the American Automobile Association, when only variable costs <br />are counted, the average cost of operating an automobile is around 13.1 cents per <br />passenger mile3 Because gasoline represents only about half of this cost, even the <br />most fuel-inefficient sport-utility vehicles cost only one or two cents more than <br />this. For example, AAA says that a Chevrolet Trailblazer costs 13.5 cents per mile <br />to operate. <br /> <br />Unless MnDOT can make a convincing case that commuter rail will lead <br />significant numbers of people to give up their automobiles completely, the 28.8 <br />cent cost that it assumes is more than twice the real operating cost. Since <br />commuter rail operates only in a narrow corridor and only during rush hour, few <br />people are likely to give up their automobiles because of the Northstar rail line. <br />Thus, the benefit calculated for vehicle operating cost savings must be reduced <br />by more than half. <br /> <br />Vehicle accident cost savings-MnDOT estimates that auto drivers suffer 1.19 <br />accidents per million miles of travel, an estimate that Anton, Lubov retained. I do <br />not know the source of this estimate. However, it is worth noting that interstate <br />highway travel tends to be much safer than travel on other roads. If the 1.19 <br />number is based on a state-wide average, it is likely to be far greater than the <br />accident rate on 1-94, the principle alternative to Northstar commuter rail. <br /> <br />Pollution cost savings-MnDOT estimated that the Northstar commuter rail <br />would lead to $33.4 million worth of air pollution benefits. Since Anton, Lubov <br />accepted this number, its report does not say how it was calculated. However, <br />the benefit is dubious, as the EPA says that Minnesota has no 'nonattainment <br />areas" for any air pollutant, meaning that it has no serious air pollution <br />problems. <br /> <br />According to the U.S. Department of Transportation, people in the Mirmeapolis- <br />St. Paul and St. Cloud urban areas drive more than 63 million miles a day. If the <br />Northstar commuter rail carries 9,600 people an average of 22.1 miles a day, and <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.