My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.1. ERMUSR 08-10-2010
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2010
>
08-10-2010
>
6.1. ERMUSR 08-10-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2010 11:12:47 AM
Creation date
8/6/2010 4:35:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
8/10/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Elk River -== <br />Municipal Utilities <br />13069 Orono Parkway • P.O. Box 430 <br />Elk River, MN 55330.0430 <br />UTILITIES COMMISSION MEETING <br />Phone: 763.441.2020 <br />Fax: 763.44 L8099 <br />TO: FROM: <br />Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission Theresa Slominski -Finance Director/Office <br />John Dietz, Chair Manager <br />Jerry Gumphrey, Vice Chair <br />D 1 Thom son, Trustee I <br />MEETING DATE: AGENDA ITEM NUMBER: <br />Au ust 10, 2010 6.1 ~' <br />SUBJECT: <br />Staff U dates -Finance Director/Office Mana er <br />DISCUSSION: <br />Last month I was asked if we had received customer complaints about the fees for utilizing the <br />credit cards and to keep the commission apprised of any such complaints. There have been three <br />complaints noted and these have been received from disconnect customers stating that this is <br />their only option and they already have to pay a $50 disconnect fee and they may incur two <br />$4.95 charges because they have to make more than one payment if the balance is over $300. I <br />have also received feedback from staff that many customers inquiring about credit card payments <br />have opted for other payment options when learning of the $4.95 fee, but I do not have an actual <br />count of those customers. One staff member kept a tally on one day and noted that five calls <br />were taken where customers inquired about credit cards, learned of the fee, and opted for <br />alternative payment methods. <br />I personally spoke with a customer (at their request) regarding the fee, and they commented that <br />it is great to be able to pay by credit card but the convenience is not so great as to warrant paying <br />$4.95. He stated that ERMU has to have some benefit in receiving payments sooner, guaranteed <br />payment, and ease of processing. He stated some customers not using credit cards may argue <br />they don't want to subsidize the processing cost to those that do pay by credit card, but taxes do <br />the same thing (if you don't have children in the schools, for example.) <br />Just as a "heads up", in the near future, we will be able to process sales of security systems via <br />credit cards. This would be different than utility bill payments due to the range of prices of <br />systems ($475 to $2,500.) A flat fee to cover the range isn't possible and so we would have to <br />process the credit cards based on a percentage fee of the sale. This cannot be passed on to the <br />customers and so must be absorbed. The security systems can easily be priced to absorb this if <br />the current margins don't support it. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.