Laserfiche WebLink
Tax Levy <br />Perhaps the most significant part of the budget process is determining how much the tax <br />levy will be. This in turn dictates the funding available to operate the general fund activities <br />of the City. Setting the levy amount is based on several factors including levy limits, required <br />debt and maintenance of effort levies, the tax revenue necessary to fund general fund <br />activities, changes in the net tax capacity (NTC), and the impact on taxpayers. <br /> <br />The 2010 levy and the 2011 levy distribution assuming no change in the total levy are shown <br />below: <br /> <br /> 2010 2011 Difference <br />General Fund $9,688,950 $9,755,913 $66,963 <br />Library 58,850 65,700 6,850 <br />Surface Water Management 50,000 50,000 - <br />City Special Assessments 16,427 17,767 1,340 <br />Improvement Bonds 207,432 204,616 (2,816) <br />Certificates of Indebtedness 89,061 - (89,061) <br />Public Safety Lease Rev. Bond 606,341 591,142 (15,199) <br />Economic Development Tax Abatement 395,330 427,253 31,923 <br /> $11,112,391 $11,112,391 - <br /> <br />As you can see, an additional $66,963 of tax revenue is available in the general fund because <br />of decreases in some of the debt levies. The other item of note is that the levy for tax <br />abatements increases $31,923. Of course, the modest increase in the general fund tax <br />revenue doesn’t go far to cover the increased operating costs of providing the same services <br />that were provided in 2010. <br /> <br />Change in Net Tax Capacity <br />After a very long trend of increasing market values and NTC, the recent trend of decreasing <br />values may be stabilizing. Last year the taxable market value decreased five percent and the <br />NTC decreased 3.5 percent. It is too early in the year to get a firm estimate of the payable <br />2011 values from the County; although, I did speak with County staff to get a very rough <br />estimate. This estimate will change, nevertheless, it gives us some indication of what to <br />expect. A conservative estimate is that the NTC could decrease up to three percent. There <br />is a possibility that it may be less and the NTC will be relatively unchanged from last year. As <br />is the case each year, more accurate estimates will be available later in the year before the <br />final levy is adopted. The one thing we know for sure is that if the NTC decreases and the <br />tax levy stays the same, the tax rate will increase. In this atypical environment of decreasing <br />property values, using the tax rate as a measure of the real tax impact to a property is not the <br />best measure. The actual tax impact to each property will depend upon whether its value <br />decreased more or less than other properties or if it increased while most others decreased. <br /> <br />Proposed 2011 General Fund Budget Highlights and Discussion Items <br />? <br /> <br />Pay and benefits: The proposed budget does not include any cost of living <br />adjustment (COLA). The last COLA employees received was 1.5 percent in January, <br />2009. Step increases are included in the budget. The cafeteria contribution includes <br />a five percent increase consistent with the 2010 increase. As you may be aware, <br />\\tsclient\S\Public Bodies\Council\Lori\2010\Budget Memo 7 12 10.doc <br /> <br />