Laserfiche WebLink
OCT-II-200] 08:]]AM FROM-ERMU T65-441-8098 T-T45 P.005/005 F-685 <br /> <br />°~ge 2 <br />.(egular meeting of the Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission <br />October 9, 2001 <br /> <br />5.3 Review Py_ooosed 2002 E~oen~e_Budget <br /> <br /> Staff reviewed the proposed Electric and Water 2002 Expense Budgets with Commission. It is noted <br />that projections are diffic,tlt at this time because of the economical problems now being posed. Bryan Adams <br />noted that electric projections of 6% may be slightly conservative. The increase in water sales was assumed at <br />0%, due to the last two summers being extremely dry. The continuing decline of profits in the electric <br />department was discussed. A general discussion of line items followed for both Eleerric and Water Budgets, <br />with comments from Staff and Commission. No action necessary at this time. <br /> <br />5.4 U~_odate prop_osed 2002 Capital Budge_t <br /> <br /> Two projects proposed to be completed over a two year time frame, now may be required in 2002. <br />The realignment of Proctor Avenue by County Road 33, and the highway interchange at County Road 33 and <br />Highway 169 will require relocation of electric feeders to serve the northern portions of Elk River. Instead of <br />temporarily relocating these feeders and then locating them to a permanent location, Staff recommended <br />completing Substation North, one year earlier. This will utilize the substation to feed northern Elk River. The <br />North. Substation will need to be completed in 2002 to allow the revised feeder plan to be finished. The plan <br />adds $550,000 to the 2002 capital budget. <br /> The second project is providing adequate water service to west Elk River. It would be difficult to serve <br />.~e expanding western area with water service without system improvements. It will be necessary to move a <br />booster station in the Meadowvale Road area and provide another water main crossing under Highway 10. The <br />plan adds $80,000.00 to the 2002 capital budget. <br /> <br /> Staff and Commission discussed the option. John Dietz and James Tralle noted their approval of <br />moving the entire projects to 2002. <br /> <br /> John Dietz moved to approve the changes in the 2002 Capital Budget regarding the proposed <br />realignment of Proctor Avenue, and the water service to western Elk River. James Tralle seconded the motion. <br />Motion carded 3-0. <br /> <br />5.5 Antenna on U. tjl.ity Water Tower <br /> <br /> Bryan Adams reviewed the history of the request for a cellular phone antenna on water towers from <br />Sprint. George Zabee reported on kis conversation with Sprint. It was decided that since Sprint had not <br />responded with a formal request to be heard at a future meeting, no action would be necessary at this time. <br /> <br />5.6 U0date Water Service Leak Assessment <br /> <br /> Bryan Adams advised Commission that he would return to November meeting of the Utilities <br />Commission with changes in policy concerning waiver of assessment. Pat Klaers noted that the City is in the <br />process of rewording the Ordinance. <br /> <br /> <br />