My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.3. SR 06-21-2010
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2010
>
06-21-2010
>
5.3. SR 06-21-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2010 3:26:20 PM
Creation date
6/18/2010 2:22:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/21/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
113
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case File: CU 10-08 Ems- ~~' <br />Page 5 Ciryof E1kRiver <br />southern edge of the Landfill. The existing buffer consists of a mostly native, undisturbed area with <br />an elevated topographic terrain. The existing terrain, which is covered by several hundred native, <br />mature trees, acts as a visual screen of the Landfill. If the fill area of the landfill stays within its <br />currently permitted area, this visual screen and buffer will remain in place and will screen landfill <br />operations from adjoining properties during the remaining life of the Landfill. <br />On the other hand, if solid waste were to be deposited in the buffer area, all of the existing trees <br />would be removed and the existing elevated terrain reduced and excavated to accommodate the <br />deposit of solid waste. Removal of the existing trees and buffer would have a substantial impact on <br />the visibility of the Landfill, making landfill operations clearly visible from 221st Avenue and, <br />potentially, the residential areas to the west, for an extended period of time while the existing buffer <br />area is filled with solid waste and a new buffer is established to the south, on the adjoining property. <br />The plans indicate that a new berm and screen would not be installed until at or near the end of <br />landfill operations in the expansion area, meaning that operations in the expansion area would be <br />visible throughout the additional 4-7 years that the landfill would remain open as the result of an <br />expansion, as well as 2-3 years until operations move into the expansion area. It will be many years <br />after that before new trees reach maturity and provide a screen comparable to the existing mature, <br />native trees. Visibility of the Landfill is an item of importance that was studied as part of the <br />Hoisington Koegler Group, Inc. (HKGi) studies previously completed to evaluate the impact of <br />various development scenarios in this area. The visual impact of the landfill operations, currently <br />blocked by the existing buffer, would be vastly changed with the removal of the present mature <br />buffer. The HKGI studies offer analysis of view sheds. Those studies are attached for the City <br />Council's review. <br />(4) Offsite Infrastructure. Expanding the area allowed for the deposit of solid waste to the <br />southern property line of the Landfill will, according to the plans submitted by the Landfill with <br />their Application for this expansion, result in significant portions of the Landfill's infrastructure <br />moving off of the Landfill's property and out of the Solid Waste Facilities Cwerlay Zoning District. <br />Infrastructure which would be moved off-site includes groundwater monitoring wells, landfill gas <br />monitoring probes, a service road around the southern boundary of the Landfill and, potentially, <br />storm water management facilities. Although it is true the Landfill has installed several groundwater <br />monitoring wells outside of its boundaries and the Solid Waste Facilities Zoning District in the past, <br />these facilities have been installed for the purpose of investigating the nature and extent of <br />contaminant migration associated with the unlined portions of the Landfill. Lined expansions of the <br />Landfill, including the lined expansions of the Landfill to date, typically require that all monitoring <br />wells and gas probes be located within the Landfill Property and the Solid Waste Facilities District. <br />Similarly, storm water management facilities are an integral part of the Landfill's operation and are <br />specifically required by City Code to be located in the SWF District. Finally, the service road around <br />the southern boundary of the Landfill is clearly a part of the Landfill operation and clearly a part of <br />the Solid Waste Facility which is the Landfill operation as that term is defined in the City Code, and <br />must be located on the Landfill's property and within the Solid Waste Facilities Zoning District. <br />(5) Alternative Expansion C-pportunities. The landfill has insisted throughout the process of <br />seeking approvals to expand to the south, and in the litigation, that expansion to the south onto new <br />property and or into the existing buffer zone is the only option for increasing the capacity of the <br />landfill. To address this issue staff asked Mr. Ledvina to investigate alternative expansion <br />Z:\CommuniryDevelopmern\Planning Main\Case Files\CUP\CU 10-08 Waste Managemern\Staff report to CGCU 10-08 - peter.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.