Laserfiche WebLink
Case File: CU 10.12 <br />Page 3 <br />SchuerInc <br />4. twill be served adequately by and will not adversely affect essential public facilities and services including <br />streets, police and fire protection, drainage, refuse disposal, water and seaver systems, parks and schools; and <br />will not, in particular, create traffic congestion or interference with traffic on adjacent and neighboring public <br />thoroughfares. <br />5. i-Vill not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that zarill be <br />detrimental to any persons or properly because of excessive traff c, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, dust or <br />vibrations. <br />6. IYlill not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. <br />7. mill fully comply avith all other requirements of this Code, including any applicable requirements and <br />standards for the issuance of a license orpermit to establish and operate the proposed use in the city. <br />If denial of such a permit should occur, it shall accompany recommendations or determinations by <br />findings or a report stating how the proposed use does not comply with the standards set forth in <br />Section 30-654. <br />In the review of the standards for CUP as outlined, it appears that the request is consistent with all <br />of these standards. <br />Analysis <br />The operation of a wash plant will be consistent with the existing operations at the site. The <br />applicant received approval to mine into the water table in 2004 and the operation will utilize the <br />water from the areas that have been excavated below the water table. Washing is expected to be <br />seasonal and intermittent depending on market demand. The applicant is required to meet noise <br />level requirements set by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and will reduce the effects of <br />noise generated from the operation during their permitted hours. The site currently operates under <br />a MPCA Air Quality and Sto~~~~~aater Permit. <br />Recommendation <br />Staff supports a recommendation of approval, subject to the conditions outlined above. <br />Action Motion by Second by Vote <br />Follow Up <br />N:\Departments\CommtuutyDevelopmern\Planning\Case Files\CUP\CU 1x12 Roger Schmidt\SRto PGdoc <br />