My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.6. SR 06-21-2010
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2010
>
06-21-2010
>
5.6. SR 06-21-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2010 3:53:14 PM
Creation date
6/18/2010 10:31:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/21/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~/ <br />Elk REQUEST FOR ACTION <br />River - <br />To <br />Planning Commission <br />Agenda Section <br />Planning Items <br />Item ®escription <br />Meeting Date <br />June 8, 2010 <br />Request b~~ City of Elk River for Rezoning of Elk River Plaza <br />PUD, Public Hearing -Case No. ZC 10-03 <br />Item Number <br />5.4 <br />Prepared by <br />Chris Leeseberg, Park Planner-Planner <br />Reviewed by <br />(enemy Barnhart, Planning Manager <br />Reviewed by <br />Action Recauested <br />Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Zone Change request. <br />Background/Discussion <br />The Planning Commission, on April 13, 2010, reviewed an overlay district to the Planned Unit <br />Development (PUD) to codify the Elk River Plaza. Since that meeting, the City Attorney believes the <br />subject area should be rezoned to a new stand alone zoning district (Mixed Use Elk River Plaza) while <br />dissolving the current Planned Unit Development agreement. <br />The only difference from what was re~~iewed at that Planning Commission meeting is that there will not <br />be an overlay district and the PUD zoning will be removed. The proposed uses and setbacks that were <br />reviewed at that meeting will be the same with the proposed new zoning district. <br />As the proposed uses are not changing from what is currently allowed, this zone change should not hate <br />anv effect on the taxes. <br />Attachments <br />Paxtial Zoning Map <br />• Current vs. Proposed Uses <br />Action <br />-Zotion by Second by Vote <br />Follow Up <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.