My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.6. PCSR 06-08-2010
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2006-2010
>
2010
>
06-08-2010
>
5.6. PCSR 06-08-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2010 11:00:21 AM
Creation date
6/4/2010 3:30:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCSR
date
6/8/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IMPLEMENTATION <br />• <br />FINANCING <br />A detailed financial analysis was not performed as part of the planning process. There <br />area many financial variables involved with complex development planning projects. <br />The following information highlights the key tools currently available to finance <br />implementation of the master plan. <br />Tax Increment Financing <br />The costs of development and redevelopment may be too great to allow new projects <br />to be financially feasible. The situation poses the classic "but for" situation in State <br />law governing tax increment financing. "But for" the use of TI F, the development as <br />proposed would not occur. It is clear that the desired redevelopment will not take <br />place without the removal of physical and economic barriers by the City. Tax increment <br />financing is the only tool with the capacity to accomplish these objectives. <br />As with other elements of the master plan, projections for the use of TIF are both <br />comprehensive and conservative. The plan seeks to provide a clear understanding <br />of what might be required with the goal of reducing public financial commitments <br />as the plan is implemented. The result can be found in other large redevelopment <br />settings. As redevelopment begins to transform an area, market forces improve. As <br />the potential income from rents and sales grow, private development can carry more <br />costs of redevelopment. <br />This master plan assumes that all of the redevelopment projects will be included in <br />TI F districts. In simplest terms, TI F allows the City to capture the property taxes from <br />redevelopment and use these monies to pay for the investments required to undertake <br />the development. Financial analysis conducted through the planning process clearly <br />shows that private development will not alone support the investments required for <br />implementing the master plan. The costs of desired development and redevelopment <br />are likely too great to consider all new projects to be financially feasible. <br />This plan does not offer a primer on the use of TIF since the City is familiar with <br />the intricacies of TIF from its use on other redevelopment projects. Instead, <br />implementation of the plan requires attention to the key issues that influence the <br />use of TIF: <br />Project Area: <br />TIF relies on two types of areas. The "project area" is a broader area with common <br />development goals. The "tax increment financing district" is the specific parcels from <br />which tax increment is collected. The project area is important because it defines <br />where tax increments can be used (see discussion of "Pooling" that follows). The <br />project area defined for this master plan should also be designated as the project area <br />forthe purpose of establishing TIF districts. <br />•r.-A• <br />`~ ; <br />171St. GV2r1U@ Focused Area STudy ]t <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.