My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.9. - 6.12. SR 09-17-2001
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2001
>
09/17/2001
>
6.9. - 6.12. SR 09-17-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:38 AM
Creation date
5/14/2003 9:40:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
9/17/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to Mayor and City Council/P 01-14 <br />September 17, 2001 <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />The Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the project site. Stone artifacts have been <br />found on the site. Their memo and recommendation is attached. <br /> <br />Park Dedication <br /> <br />At the Park and Recreation Commission meeting of August 8, 2001 the Commission <br />reviewed the request for park dedication purposes. The Commission concurred with staff's <br />recommendation that sidewalks should be provided on one side of each of the public streets <br />and also a 50-foot trail easement should be provided to Hillside City Park. The Commission <br />recommended cash dedication for the subdivision due to the presence of Hillside City Park, <br />a recreation area directly east of and adjacent to the project. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Action <br /> <br />The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing regarding the requests at its August <br />28, 2001 meeting. The only residents who spoke regarding the proposal were Robert and <br />Susan Black who reside at the corner of Twin Lakes Road and County Road 12. Their <br />concerns were for future access to their property. A condition of the plat requires a <br />driveway for their property. <br /> <br />The applicant requested approval of a PUD and the preliminary plat for the twelve single <br />family units to allow them to begin grading on the property. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />Staff and the Planning recommend the following to the City Council: <br /> <br />1. Denial of the request for a waiver to the townhome moratorium as the applicant has not <br /> provided sufficient evidence of hardship. <br />2. Denial of the request to rezone the property from Single Family Dwelling to Planned <br /> Unit Development as after the adoption of the revised townhome moratorium, a <br /> townhome development will require a rezoning to R3, Multiple Family Dwelling. <br />3. Denial of the Preliminary Plat. <br />4. Denial of the Conditional Use Permit. <br /> <br />Without a rezoning to PUD, the preliminary plat and conditional use permit are void. The <br />applicant could request approval of a single family plat and leave the multi-family portions as <br />outlots until the revised ordinance is adopted and the moratorium lifted. <br /> <br />If the City Council finds that the applicant has provided sufficient evidence of hardship to <br />grant a waiver to the townhome moratorium, and the City Council elects to approve the <br />remaining land use requests, staff recommends the following findings and conditions: <br /> <br />I~nding$ of Fact for the Rezoning Request: <br /> <br />I. THE REQUEST IS CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND USE PLAN. <br /> <br />S:\PLANNING\MICHMC\CCREPRTS\P01-14.DOC <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.