My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8. SR 12-11-1995
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1995
>
12-11-1995 SP
>
8. SR 12-11-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2014 9:21:51 AM
Creation date
6/3/2010 9:46:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
12/11/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comprehensive Plan <br />December 11, 1995 <br />Page 3 <br />• III. What Are the Costs Associated With Development? <br />Attached to this memo are summaries from reports along with articles that <br />discuss the costs and revenues associated with development. The following <br />sources of information are included for the Council's review: <br />• Executive Summary - A summary of a report by Resource Management <br />Consultants, Inc., entitled: "Development in Wright County - The <br />Revenue /Cost Relationship "; <br />• Article by Lee Ronning of the Land Stewardship Project - "Farm Land's <br />Top Yield Isn't Residential Taxes "; <br />• Excerpt from a report by the Environmental Quality Board, entitled: "A <br />Question of Balance and Managing Growth in the Environment "; <br />• Excerpt from a book by Randall Arendt, entitled: " Rural By Design "; <br />• An Executive Summary along with Impact Analysis for each zoning <br />district from a study done by the City of Lakeville, entitled: "Growth <br />Management Strategies for the City of Lakeville ". <br />• In summarizing these articles, the following points should be highlighted: <br />• The costs of growth for low density development are higher than growth <br />at a higher density. <br />• Quote: "It is fiscally sound to concentrate growth around areas with <br />existing infrastructure and discourage growth on large lots and farming <br />areas." <br />• Relatively high density development close to existing urban infrastructure <br />provides less expense locally and to the state over the long term. <br />Residential projects that consume large amounts of land often costs <br />communities more than they give back in property taxes. <br />• The small clusters of one and two acre residential lots interspersed with <br />agricultural areas have contributed to uncontrolled development and <br />imposes a significant financial and environmental problem for Otsego. <br />• Large lot residential zoning, often enacted by communities that would like <br />to preserve open space such as wood land and farm land is to a large part <br />responsible for the high levels of land consumption experienced by <br />communities. <br />s:council:Complan <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.