My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8. SR 12-11-1995
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1995
>
12-11-1995 SP
>
8. SR 12-11-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2014 9:21:51 AM
Creation date
6/3/2010 9:46:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
12/11/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
South Fork Apartments <br />This area has newly constructed apartment buildings through a tax increment financing project. It is located near <br />•the commercial area of I -35 and Hwy. 50 and provides a critical customer base for that commercial area. These are <br />nicely landscaped and maintained buildings. There are a large number of families living here while waiting or their <br />homes to be built. g <br />Zoning: <br />R-7 <br />Average Property Taxes: $1,109 <br />School District: <br />Lakeville <br />Avg. # Children per Unit: .62 <br />Avg. Market Value: <br />527,916 <br />Avg. # People per Unit: 2.33 <br />Average Unit Age: <br />4 Years <br />ANALYSIS: <br />South Fork Apartments Addition turns an overall negative fiscal impact for the City and the school district. It is <br />mainly serviced by the I -35 and Hwy. 50 business area and the Burnsville Center area. When the tax increment <br />financing is not calculated into the revenues, this addition has a significantly smaller negative impact (almost none) <br />to the City. However, there is an overall negative impact to the school district. This TIF is approximately 20 years <br />in duration. <br />SOUTH FORK APARTMENTS (All Phases) <br />* Reference Appendix C for fiscal impact without TIF <br />FINDINGS: <br />Despite high concentration, the tax increment financing burdens City finances. The City should keep in mind, <br />however, that this area has contributed significantly to the success of the commercial area at Interstate 35 and <br />Highway 50. The losses in South Fork should be compared to the positive fiscal impact of the commercial <br />development. These areas fiscally balance each other. Tax increment financing generally should only be used for <br />construction of municipal infrastructure, such as roads, senior centers, etc. Overall site quality is exemplary. <br />is <br />24 <br />Annual Operating <br />City <br />School <br />" <br />Figures <br />District <br />Expenditures <br />$144,663 <br />$742,144 <br />Revenues <br />112,698 <br />613,931 <br />Net Impact <br />(31, 965) <br />(128, 213) <br />Overall Net <br />(160,178) <br />op <br />Per Acre Impact <br />(924) <br />(3,706) <br />Overall Net per <br />(4,629) <br />Acre <br />* Reference Appendix C for fiscal impact without TIF <br />FINDINGS: <br />Despite high concentration, the tax increment financing burdens City finances. The City should keep in mind, <br />however, that this area has contributed significantly to the success of the commercial area at Interstate 35 and <br />Highway 50. The losses in South Fork should be compared to the positive fiscal impact of the commercial <br />development. These areas fiscally balance each other. Tax increment financing generally should only be used for <br />construction of municipal infrastructure, such as roads, senior centers, etc. Overall site quality is exemplary. <br />is <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.