My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8. SR 12-11-1995
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1995
>
12-11-1995 SP
>
8. SR 12-11-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2014 9:21:51 AM
Creation date
6/3/2010 9:46:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
12/11/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Oak Shores 3rd Addition <br />This area has primarily owner - occupied twinhomes. The houses are well constructed and designed to blend into the <br />• landscape. The general condition of the housing could be described as very well maintained and attractive. <br />Zoning: <br />R -4 Average Property Taxes: $1,389 <br />School District: <br />Lakeville Avg. ## Children per Unit: .74 <br />Avg. Market Value: <br />556,371 Avg. ## People per Unit: 2.38 <br />Average Unit Age: <br />12 Years <br />ANALYSIS: <br />Oak Shores 3rd Addition positively impacts the City finances. Standard street and fire service is provided to this <br />area. It is mainly serviced by the Apple Valley commercial area on Cedar Avenue. It represents a quality <br />twinhomes housing development which will likely retain its value for some time to come. <br />OAK SHORES 3RD ADDITION <br />Overall Net per (496) <br />Acre <br />FINDINGS: <br />This type of development conserves on land area and is of enduring quality. Although a negative fiscal impact, it is <br />relatively small in comparison to the other areas. If possible, the City should make efforts to encourage developers <br />to replicate the more positive aspects of this neighborhood. <br />• <br />1I <br />�s <br />Annual Operating <br />City <br />School <br />Figures <br />District <br />x1 <br />Expenditures <br />$9,235 <br />$55,541 <br />.y ¢ <br />r <br />Revenues <br />9,964 <br />53,027 <br />Net Impact <br />729 <br />(2,514) <br />Overall Net <br />(1, 785) <br />Per Acre Impact <br />202 <br />(698) <br />Overall Net per (496) <br />Acre <br />FINDINGS: <br />This type of development conserves on land area and is of enduring quality. Although a negative fiscal impact, it is <br />relatively small in comparison to the other areas. If possible, the City should make efforts to encourage developers <br />to replicate the more positive aspects of this neighborhood. <br />• <br />1I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.