Laserfiche WebLink
collection of older tractors. The attached memo to the Planning Commission <br />• explains this request in detail. <br />• <br />Planning Commission Recommendation <br />At the September 26, 1995, Planning Commission meeting, the Planning <br />Commission recommended denial of this variance because it does not meet the <br />five conditions needed to grant a variance according to the City Ordinance. <br />The Planning Commission indicated that, although they would have liked to <br />grant the variance, they were unable to justify hardship. The existing accessory <br />structure ordinance limits property owners in the R1 -a zoning district to 2,000 <br />square feet of attached and detached accessory structure area. The Planning <br />Commission felt that larger property owners in this district, like Mr. Kramer, <br />should be allowed additional accessory structure space. At the direction of the <br />City Council, staff will be bringing an ordinance amendment to the Planning <br />Commission and City Council in the next few weeks. This amendment will <br />increase the allowable accessory structure area for large property owners in this <br />district. <br />Recommendation <br />Staff and the Planning Commission feel that this request does not meet the five <br />conditions for granting a variance and, therefore, recommends denial of the <br />variance to exceed the maximum size of accessory structure area. <br />S AP LA N N I N G \KE N D RA \V95 -8. D O C <br />