My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1. SR 09-17-2001
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2001
>
09/17/2001
>
4.1. SR 09-17-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:38 AM
Creation date
5/14/2003 9:14:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
9/17/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 <br />Regular meeting of the Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission <br />September 12, 2001 <br /> <br />5.3 Administration Building Update <br /> <br /> The possibility of a larger administration building has been considered since 1999, with several sites <br />having been explored. Pat Klaers appeared to speak of the wishes of City Council, and City Staff to have the <br />Utilities located at City Hall. A strong case by the City Administrator was presented, including the fact that the <br />land for the office area for the Utilities would be at no cost, the Utility area could be custom designed, a central <br />telephone system, common rooms for employees, and one-stop shopping for builder/developer customers. It <br />was also noted that the sharing of personnel policies, as well as the sharing of employees would be possible if <br />the Utilities shared City Hall. <br /> <br /> George Zabee voiced his concerns that the City would be in a position to gradually absorb the Utility. <br />John Dietz and James Tralle noted that they feel the downtown area has gone by the way-side, and that new <br />offices at City Hall' appears to be a more attractive option than other possibilities. George Zabee contends that <br />he would like to make an offer on the land on Jackson Avenue. Pat Klaers, John Dietz, and James Tralle <br />explained their concerns with that site. <br /> <br /> The points that were agreed upon were, a. the present Utility building should not have extensive <br />remodeling, and b. the First National Insurance/Mortgage building is of an age that makes it a risky choice. <br />Utility Staff would prefer to remain in the downtown area to accommodate the customers who presently walk <br />in, and support the downtown Chamber of Commerce. The Commission desires to pursue the option of sharing <br />City Hall. <br /> <br />5.4 LFG Project Update <br /> <br /> Bryan Adams apprised the Commission that the County is presently in budgeting, and are slightly <br />apprehensive of the project at this time. However, meetings with Sherburne County to address issues were <br />scheduled, but due to events in New York, the meetings have been delayed. Staff is hopeful that the project <br />will continue to move forward. <br /> <br />6.1 Authorize Proposals for Additional Electric Line Truck <br /> <br /> Staff reviewed the reasons for adding an additional electric line truck to initiate a service crew for <br />maintenance. <br /> <br /> John Dietz moved to authorize Staff to solicit quotations for an additional Line Truck, with award at the <br />November, 2001 Commission meeting. George Zabee seconded the motion. Motion carried 3-0. <br /> <br />Other Business <br />Bryan Adams updated the Commission on the decision by the City to leave ownership of sewer lines as it is. <br />The question before the Commission is how they wish to handle the water services line. It appears that the <br />authority to certify improvements for repair of broken water service lines presently exists, and that no change in <br />the Ordinance would be necessary. Pat Klaers will check the Ordinance as it pertains to the Utility. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.